Let the name of Yahweh, theonly true name of God upon which all the true prophets have called, who inflesh was known by the name Lord Jesus Christ, be glorified forever and ever.Amen.
Dear Friends at TNTJ,
We are in receipt of your emaildated March 20, 2012. We are amused by your blatant shamelessness in yourcontinual attempts to evade the debate on Quran while at the same timepretending to be ready for the debate. You should always remember that we aretrying to host the debate in Kochi only because you continue to refuse to abideby the signed agreement and you continue to refuse to have a private recordeddebate (means without live telecast). If you really wanted this debate to takeplace, you should have kept all the legally viable options open. SAN has kept allthe options (approaching Chennai police as per the signed agreement, privaterecorded debate as per the agreement over email and hosting it in anotherplace) open; but TNTJ REFUSES TWO OF OTHER OPTIONS and IS NOW TRYING TO CLOSETHE THIRD OPTION as well but still pretends of being ready. When you are notready for the other two legally viable options, what right you have even toclaim of being ready? Your pretensions of being ready to debate on Quran arelaughable.
Further, it is very clearas to why you do not want to debate with us on Quran though you pretendotherwise. As we refuted you in the debate on the Holy Bible exposing yourdouble standard, you know for sure that you will be thoroughly exposed of yourshallow arguments on Quran and we would beyond any doubt prove that Quran can neverbe the God’s word. Was that not the reason for violating even the agreement onprivate recorded debate by purposely advertising about online telecast? Wereyou not trying to provoke us and thereby escape from the debate by pastingposters and banners by violating the signed agreement? We overlooked yourprovocations because we wanted the debate to take place and expose your emptyboastings and shallow arguments. We only objected when your actions wentagainst the police order. Moreover, not only that you were and are afraid todebate with us on the topic of Quran, you seem to be even scared to release thevideo of your drama of January 28. If you provide us a copy or upload avideo of good quality in public, you know that we would refute and expose everysingle so-called argument of yours, which would completely destroy theintellectual credibility of TNTJ, if anything is left. Whenever you muster somecourage and provide us a video copy of your drama of January 28, you can bewell assured that your shallow arguments would be once more exposed andrefuted.
When we suggested themodification to two-day debate or mentioned about the debate on the Holy Bible,we have not written anything which you disagree. Both SAN & TNTJ agree thata two-day debate on the Holy Bible has taken place in Chennai. The onlydisagreement is whether one should consider your drama on January 28 as adebate, which no one in the world, except TNTJ, considers as a debate. Now, forour modification that “A two-day debate has already been conducted in Chennaipeacefully,” you have suggested to change to debate for some days have beenconducted in Chennai peacefully. We think that even your proposal to changetwo-days to some days carry a connotation of more than two days. However, sincewe do not want you to escape by citing this, we suggest that both SAN &TNTJ should drop all reference to number of days (whether two or some) andsimply write as ‘SAN and TNTJ have already conducted similar debate in Chennaipeacefully.”
We are open to yoursuggestions and modifications and we are proposing reasonable alternativesbecause TNTJ is going to provide the letter in TNTJ letterhead and SAN in SAN’sletterhead. However, since SAN representative is going to submit the letter tothe Kochi police, the content should be something which SAN representative canexplain to police. If police asks about some statement in TNTJ letter, SANrepresentative cannot say that SAN does not agree with that statement. If wesay that, police would ask us why we are submitting a letter which we ourselvesdoes not agree with.
Now, we feel pity yourdelirious attempts to make an entire planet out of an ant-hill of a minoreditorial oversight of the word private in the subject line of draft of theletter to Kochi police. Anyone who reads our previous emails can easilyunderstand what we intended as our emails are clearer than the book whichclaims to be clear but have “allegorical” ayats whose meaning which none knowsexcept the all-knowing pretender who revealed it.
Further, how can you, whoare trying every means to evade from the debate on Quran (not even being readyfor the other options and even making silly excuses in matters such as letterto Kochi police), still mock the Holy God of all the true prophets? Don’t youknow that your fabricated Wali has left you in your current pathetic situationthat you have to devise means to evade from the debate on Quran? Further, whatright does TNTJ has to make an issue out of one minor editorial oversight? Didnot the hadith collectors such as Sheikh Bukhari and Sheikh Muslim commit manyerrors in hadith collection as per you? Did not the hadith narratorscommit errors in narrating hadiths as per you? Are not the Muslims across the last 1400 yearscommit errors in accepting those hadiths as genuine as per you? Are you not thesame group who accepts one hadith today and throws it to the dustbin tomorrowby even using biddah methodologies such ‘impracticality’ (or lack of trust???)as a test for genuine hadiths? When you commit blunders day in and day out evenon matters of utmost importance such as your faith, what right do you have toeven speak one sentence against others?
The letter to the Kochipolice cannot have the word private in any part of the letter and we suggest itbe replaced by ‘indoor debate.’ Further, when you are not ready for a privaterecorded debate, why do you want to add the word private to an indoor debatewhich would be publicly live telecasted? Is it to hide the fact from peoplethat you are not even ready for a private recorded debate? If you are ready forthe private recorded debate, do let us know and we can have it without the police permission. If you want the debate to be live telecasted (which is whatyou insist), the word private cannot be there in any part of the letter to theKochi police. Once you make this amendment, do let us know when we can come andcollect the letter to be handed over to Kochi police. It would be difficult getsuitable venues on April 28 & 29 if any further delay happens and the dateswould have to be accordingly changed. We also remind you that other two optionsare still open and you have to abide by the signed agreement.
Awaiting your letter to the Kochi police andthe debate on Quran.
Thanks and regards,SAN